Abstract
Introduction: ‘Early-onset’ studies have shown that symptomatic response often occurs early and
that early symptomatic response is predictive for later outcome. Limiting factors
of these studies include the restriction on symptomatic outcome, the inclusion of
mostly moderately ill patients, and the use of various antipsychotics.
Methods: Response and remission rates were assessed in 528 severely ill patients with schizophrenia
at baseline, week 2, 4 and 12 using PANSS, SWN-K, CGI-S, and SOFAS. The clinical measures
were combined to one outcome criterion (CombOut). Predicitive validity was analyzed
for CombOut using linear regression models.
Results: Rate and time to response differed markedly between outcome measures. 32% reached
positive symptom response at week 2, 58% at week 4 and 85% at week 12. Non-response
at week 4, but not at week 2 was predictive for later non-response. The combined outcome
criterion was best predicted by early response in subjective wellbeing (T=−7.88, p<0.001)
and social functioning (T=−7.43, p<0.001).
Discussion: Rate and time to response might depend on sample characteristics and outcome measure.
In severely ill patients early antipsychotic response is possibly delayed from the
first 2 to the first 4 weeks. Early response in subjective wellbeing and social functioning
are strong predictors for overall outcome, which make them a useful supplementation
to the assessment of symptomatic response.
References
1
Leucht S, Busch R, Kissling W.
Early prediction of antipsychotic nonresponse among patients with schizophrenia.
The Journal of clinical psychiatry.
2007;
68
352-360
2
Lambert M, Schimmelmann BG, Naber D. et al .
Prediction of remission as a combination of symptomatic and functional remission and
adequate subjective well-being in 2960 patients with schizophrenia.
The Journal of clinical psychiatry.
2006;
67
1690-1697
3
Lambert M, Naber D, Eich FX. et al .
Remission of severely impaired subjective wellbeing in 727 patients with schizophrenia
treated with amisulpride.
Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica.
2007;
115
106-113
4
Lehman AF, Lieberman JA, Dixon LB. et al .
Practice guideline for the treatment of patients with schizophrenia, second edition.
The American journal of psychiatry.
2004;
161
1-56
5
Agid O, Kapur S, Arenovich T. et al .
Delayed-onset hypothesis of antipsychotic action: a hypothesis tested and rejected.
Archives of general psychiatry.
2003;
60
1228-1235
6
Correll CU, Malhotra AK, Kaushik S. et al .
Early prediction of antipsychotic response in schizophrenia.
The American journal of psychiatry.
2003;
160
2063-2065
7
Chang YC, Lane HY, Yang KH. et al .
Optimizing early prediction for antipsychotic response in schizophrenia.
Journal of clinical psychopharmacology.
2006;
26
554-559
8
Leucht S, Busch R, Hamann J. et al .
Early-onset hypothesis of antipsychotic drug action: a hypothesis tested, confirmed
and extended.
Biological psychiatry.
2005;
57
1543-1549
9
Li M, Fletcher PJ, Kapur S.
Time course of the antipsychotic effect and the underlying behavioral mechanisms.
Neuropsychopharmacology.
2007;
32
263-272
10
Agid O, Seeman P, Kapur S.
The “delayed onset” of antipsychotic action–an idea whose time has come and gone.
J Psychiatry Neurosci.
2006;
31
93-100
11
Flyckt L, Mattsson M, Edman G. et al .
Predicting 5-year outcome in first-episode psychosis: construction of a prognostic
rating scale.
The Journal of clinical psychiatry.
2006;
67
916-924
12
Hofer A, Rettenbacher MA, Edlinger M. et al .
Outcomes in schizophrenia outpatients treated with amisulpride or olanzapine.
Pharmacopsychiatry.
2007;
40
1-8
13
Andreasen NC, Carpenter
Jr
WT, Kane JM. et al .
Remission in schizophrenia: proposed criteria and rationale for consensus.
Am J Psychiatry.
2005;
162
441-449
14
Lambert M, Schimmelmann BG, Karow A. et al .
Subjective well-being and initial dysphoric reaction under antipsychotic drugs – concepts,
measurement and clinical relevance.
Pharmacopsychiatry.
2003;
36
(Suppl 3)
S181-S190
15
DeHaan L, Weisfelt M, Dingemans PM. et al .
Psychometric properties of the Subjective Well-Being Under Neuroleptics scale and
the Subjective Deficit Syndrome Scale [Medico-economic study of Leponex (clozapine)
in the Bordeaux Charles Perrens Hospital Center].
Psychopharmacology (Berl).
2002;
162
24-28
16
Schimmelmann BG, Paulus S, Schacht M. et al .
Subjective distress related to side effects and subjective well-being in first admitted
adolescents with early-onset psychosis treated with atypical antipsychotics.
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol.
2005;
15
249-258
17
Putzhammer A, Perfahl M, Pfeiff L. et al .
Correlation of subjective well-being in schizophrenic patients with gait parameters,
expert-rated motor disturbances, and psychopathological status.
Pharmacopsychiatry.
2005;
38
132-138
18
Karow A, Czekalla J, Dittmann RW. et al .
Association of subjective well-being, symptoms, and side effects with compliance after
12 months of treatment in schizophrenia.
The Journal of clinical psychiatry.
2007;
68
75-80
19
Wehmeier PM, Kluge M, Schacht A. et al .
Correlation of physician and patient rated quality of life during antipsychotic treatment
in outpatients with schizophrenia.
Schizophrenia research.
2007;
91
178-186
20
Wehmeier PM, Kluge M, Schneider E. et al .
Quality of life and subjective well-being during treatment with antipsychotics in
out-patients with schizophrenia.
Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry.
2007;
31
703-712
21
WHO
.The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders.
Diagnostic criteria for research . In. Geneva: WHO 1993
22
Kay SR, Fiszbein A, Opler LA.
The positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia.
SchizophrBull.
1987;
13
261-276
23 Guy W. Clinical Global Impression. In: Guy W, ed
ECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology, rev. Rockville . US Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Public Health Service, Alcohol,
Drug Abuse and Mental Health Administration, NIMH Psychopharmacology Research Branch.
Division of Extramural Research Programms 1976: pp. 218-222
24
APA
.
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed. Washington . DC: American Psychiatric Press 1994
25
Naber D, Moritz S, Lambert M. et al .
Improvement of schizophrenic patients; subjective well-being under atypical antipsychotic
drugs.
Schizophr Res.
2001;
50
((1–2))
79-88
26
Haro JM, Kamath SA, Ochoa S. et al .
The Clinical Global Impression-Schizophrenia scale: a simple instrument to measure
the diversity of symptoms present in schizophrenia.
Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl.
2003;
16-23
27
Naber D.
A self-rating to measure subjective effects of neuroleptic drugs, relationships to
objective psychopathology, quality of life, compliance and other clinical variables.
Int Clin Psychopharmacol.
1995;
10
(Suppl 3)
133-138
28
Lambert M, Conus P, Schimmelmann BG. et al .
Comparison of olanzapine and risperidone in 367 first-episode patients with non-affective
or affective psychosis: results of an open retrospective medical record study.
Pharmacopsychiatry.
2005;
38
206-213
29
Haro JM, Edgell ET, Novick D. et al .
Effectiveness of antipsychotic treatment for schizophrenia: 6-month results of the
Pan-European Schizophrenia Outpatient Health Outcomes (SOHO) study.
Acta Psychiatr Scand.
2005;
111
220-231
30
Kopelowicz A, Liberman RP.
Biobehavioral treatment and rehabilitation of schizophrenia.
Harv Rev Psychiatry.
1995;
3
55-64
31
Haro JM, Novick D, Suarez D. et al .
Remission and relapse in the outpatient care of schizophrenia: three-year results
from the Schizophrenia Outpatient Health Outcomes study.
Journal of clinical psychopharmacology.
2006;
26
571-578
32 Liberman RP, Kopelowicz A. Recovery from schizophrenia: a concept in search of
research.
Psychiatric services . Washington, DC 2005 56: 735-742
33
Aiken LR.
Formulas for equating ratings on different scales.
Educational and Psychological Measurement.
1987;
51-54
34
Perkins DO, Gu H, Boteva K. et al .
Relationship between duration of untreated psychosis and outcome in first-episode
schizophrenia: a critical review and meta-analysis.
Am J Psychiatry.
2005;
162
1785-1804
35
Crespo-Facorro B, Pelayo-Teran JM, Perez-Iglesias R. et al .
Predictors of acute treatment response in patients with a first episode of non-affective
psychosis: sociodemographics, premorbid and clinical variables.
Journal of psychiatric research.
2007;
41
659-666
36
McDermott BE, Sautter FJ, Garver DL.
Heterogeneity of schizophrenia: relationship to latency of neuroleptic response.
Psychiatry research.
1991;
37
97-103
37
Davis JM, Chen N, Glick ID.
A meta-analysis of the efficacy of second-generation antipsychotics.
Arch Gen Psychiatry.
2003;
60
553-564
38
Semiz UB, Cetin M, Basoglu C. et al .
Clinical predictors of therapeutic response to clozapine in a sample of Turkish patients
with treatment-resistant schizophrenia.
Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry.
2007;
31
1330-1336
39
Remington G, Saha A, Chong SA. et al .
Augmentation strategies in clozapine-resistant schizophrenia.
CNS drugs.
2005;
19
843-872
40
de Haan L, Nimwegen L, Amelsvoort T. et al .
Improvement of subjective well-being and enduring symptomatic remission, a 5-year
follow-up of first episode schizophrenia.
Pharmacopsychiatry.
2008;
41
125-128
41
Jager M, Messer T, Laux G. et al .
Standardized remission criteria in schizophrenia: descriptive validity and comparability
with previously used outcome measures.
Pharmacopsychiatry.
2008;
41
190-195
42
Wiersma D, Wanderling J, Dragomirecka E. et al .
Social disability in schizophrenia: its development and prediction over 15 years in
incidence cohorts in six European centers.
Psychological medicine.
2000;
30
1155-1167
Correspondence
M. LambertMD
Psychosis Early Detection and Intervention Centre (PEDIC)
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy
Centre for Psychosocial Medicine
University Medical Center
Hamburg-Eppendorf
Martinistraße 52
20246 Hamburg
Germany
Phone: 0049/40/7410 576 70
Fax: 0049/40/7410 554 55
Email: lambert@uke.uni-hamburg.de